When new roads are built in the Netherlands, the old road is often retained to function as a through route for bicycles. Maps from the 1940s show this as a direct through route for all traffic. A new ring road was built as a bypass of the city in the 1960s as this area was developed and the old main road was no longer required to operate as a through route. Over time, the older road became more fragmented and less useful to drivers, but it has retained its original purpose as a through route by bicycle. This video and blog post show what the old main-road now looks like.
The resulting route for bikes is only part cycle-path, but it is almost completely car free because it is not a through route by motor vehicle. A bollard which prevents drivers from using this path has been removed for winter. |
It is not permitted to cycle on the ring road. However, there is also no reason why you would want to. There are a far wider range of routes available by bicycle. Using the bicycle routes avoids almost all traffic light junctions and allows shorter distances to be travelled to get to the same destination and therefore they lead to shorter journey times than would be possible if we cycled on the roads which are for cars.
The noise barriers were installed in 2007 when the ring road was widened to cope with increased traffic due to further expansion of Assen and this separated the old main road from the new ring-road.
cycle-paths, because otherwise cyclists would be shunted onto inefficient indirect routes in order to maintain safety. It is important that cycle-routes, whether they use old roads or new cycle-paths, are always direct and preferably that they avoid delays such as at traffic lights.
The same road in 1962. The white rectangles are where the apartment blocks in the video were being built. The few houses on the left of the road were demolished at some point. |
1, 2, 3, 4).
Other articles show how more segregation of modes can be achieved without building cycle-paths, and how unravelling of modes makes conditions better for cycling.
Note: This is a particularly obvious example because the new road has been built beside the old. For our purposes this makes it particularly useful to demonstrate how this works because it is so obvious. However it isn't necessary for the space to exist to make parallel roads like this. In most cases the new road is built at a greater distance and as a result after a few years have passed there isn't necessarily such an obvious connection between the two roads as is the case here.
Read another article showing the position of every traffic light in Assen for an illustration of how traffic has been routed away from the places where cyclists mostly are to be found now, and how cyclists therefore avoid traffic lights at far more locations than merely along this route.
Note: This is a particularly obvious example because the new road has been built beside the old. For our purposes this makes it particularly useful to demonstrate how this works because it is so obvious. However it isn't necessary for the space to exist to make parallel roads like this. In most cases the new road is built at a greater distance and as a result after a few years have passed there isn't necessarily such an obvious connection between the two roads as is the case here.
Read another article showing the position of every traffic light in Assen for an illustration of how traffic has been routed away from the places where cyclists mostly are to be found now, and how cyclists therefore avoid traffic lights at far more locations than merely along this route.
7 comments:
The classic example of a HUGE missed opportunity to do just this was Devils' Punchbowl and the Hindhead tunnel. Instead of retaining the old road that followed the contours, it was ripped out completely forcing cyclists to climb and descend a pretty big hill instead.
In the UK it seems that cyclists and walkers have a bigger impact on the environment that motor traffic does.
The classic example of a HUGE missed opportunity to do just this was at Devils' Punchbowl when the Hindhead tunnel was built (for £371,000,000 - we have plenty of money for cars!). Instead of retaining the old road that followed the contours, it was ripped out completely forcing cyclists to climb and descend a pretty big hill instead.
In the UK it seems that cyclists and walkers have a bigger impact on the environment that motor traffic does.
Sometimes I just think we're doomed to repeat the same thing over and over. (When I say "we", I'm only talking about the rest of us, not the Dutch or the Danes etc.)
While I'll admit that our councils are unwilling to bury themselves financially on the one hand, that then results in no room to do anything with any long term results/thinking. It's all about the "now". Never looking ahead.
I think I have 'bike path envy'.
Some of the 1970s Dutch-style cycleways of Stevenage used the old roads, with cars getting fast, new roads.
http://www.roadswerenotbuiltforcars.com/stevenage
Sadly, residents of Stevenage never took to the Houten-like cycleways, and despite having excellent separated routes, drove everywhere instead.
In Clackmannanshire (and partly Stirling), Scotland, this approach has been used, well, with the A907 Alloa-Stirling Road that was realigned some years ago, with the old road retained.
It fails though that on meeting the A91 Stirling distributor, the cycle route entirely gives up. Travelling to Stirling, you're then face with a hostile roundabout and a nasty, narrow, continuation of the A907 on the other side.
Carlton: From what I've seen, people have already pointed out the fallacy of your argument that in Stevenage somehow people didn't "take to" the cycle-paths.
As I've pointed out many times, a few sparse cycle-paths are not enough. What is needed to encourage a higher modal share for cycling is a comprehensive grid which allows for everyone to make all their journeys by bike with a high degree of both safety and convenience.
I've also pointed out how common it is in the Netherlands for cycling journeys to be more direct than driving journeys. This post gives an example, and there are many more.
Stevenage, on the other hand, favours driving over cycling. What's more, Stevenage's network is no longer so comprehensive as it used to be. Recent developments in the town have expanded the roads but not the cycling network, meaning that it no longer serves all destinations. Therefore it can no longer be expected to work so well as it did at its peak.
Simply put, the cycling network is not as comprehensive in Stevenage now as it was 40 years ago and therefore it should be no surprise to any of us that cycling is no longer so popular in Stevenage as it was 40 years ago.
It is unfortunate that Stevenage has quite clearly gone backwards with regard to the two things which are most important for encouraging cycling.
Anyway, you're a visitor who only seems to turn up here when there's something to gain. I wish you all the best with your book, however one free plug is enough. Given experience of your manner of contribution in the past I ask you to keep it civil this time.
In British Columbia many towns are linear because of mountains and they follow the road. Sad because children on tricycles have nowhere to ride them except on the single road that semi-trucks go on.
In many places though when they make a newer road, the old one becomes a "service road" for local usage. It tends to be in sections with interruptions. If they were simply connected for cycling then there would be long continuous cycle routes created.
Post a Comment